Search This Blog

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Questions asked of the Diocese of Salford regarding the case of Canon Mortimer Stanley

Concerned About Abuse in the Diocese of Salford
Press release - 12 May 2016

The group Concerned About Abuse in the Diocese of Salford (https://www.facebook.com/concernedaboutabuseinthecatholicdioceseofsalford/?ref=bookmarks ) is asking several questions of the Diocese of Salford and its bishop following the first day of the trial of Canon Mortimer Stanley, former parish priest of St Vincent’s, Rochdale (http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/102921/retired-priest-father-mortimer-stanley-accused-of-sexually-abusing-children-over-four-decades).
Spokesperson, Dr Philip Gilligan said,
"In December 2013 when the media first reported that Canon Stanley was being questioned under police caution, Salford Diocese gave a statement which said: “The Diocese is co-operating fully with the police and the statutory agencies in these investigations in line with the robust safeguarding policies put in place by the Catholic Church in this country in recent years.” (http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/rochdale-catholic-priest-canon-mortimer-6381949). The “robust safeguarding policies” referred to were presumably those recommended by the Nolan Report twelve years earlier and accepted in full by Bishop Terence Brain of Salford and all the other Roman Catholic Bishops in England and Wales in November 2001.
But what the statement from the Diocese of Salford in 2013 did not report was what actions it had taken during the preceding eleven years that followed Canon Stanley’s ‘retirement’ as a parish priest in the Diocese of Salford. This has,however, become a very pertinent question now that we know that the jury at Manchester's Minshull Street Court was told on Wednesday (11 May 2016) that Canon Stanley had “retired in 2002 and returned to Ireland shortly after the mother of one of the female complainants informed teaching staff that he had inappropriately kissed her daughter” (See:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/god-like-priest-who-playground-7941853).

We need to know from the Diocese of Salford and from Bishop John Arnold, in particular: Who in the diocese was told about the information given to the teaching staff at St Vincent’s? What action was taken? Was the matter ever discussed with the Diocesan Child Protection Co-ordinator or the Diocesan Child Protection Adviser or by the Diocesan Child Protection Commission, established at the beginning of 2002? Was the information shared with the police and other statutory agencies in 2002?

Could the matters now before the court have been dealt with more than a decade ago, if someone in the Diocese of Salford had acted differently and in accordance with the recommendations that Bishop Brain pledged to implement when he accepted them in November 2001?"

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Abuse campaigner disputes removal from Vatican child protection commission

See http://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/3007/0/british-abuse-campaigner-steps-away-from-pope-s-safeguarding-commission

A British abuse survivor is disputing his removal from a Vatican child protection commission and is seeking a meeting with Pope Francis about the matter.
Today the Holy See announced that Peter Saunders was no longer a member of a pontifical safeguarding body and was taking a “leave of absence” to consider his position.
Mr Saunders had been appointed to serve on a commission set up by Pope Francis tasked with improving the Church’s handling of abuse across the world. 
He has been critical of the slow pace of reform by the Church in relation to abuse and just before the commission began its latest round of meetings called for the Pope to attend the gathering adding that it would be “outrageous” if he failed to do so.
Hours after the Vatican released a statement saying he had left the safeguarding body, Mr Saunders told reporters in Rome that he has not left his position and would only talk to the Pope about his ongoing participation in the group.
According to the National Catholic Reporter, Mr Saunders said: "I did not make a decision to take or accept any decision on a leave of absence” and added: "my understanding is that I was appointed by Pope Francis and therefore I can only be removed by Pope Francis.”
He has asked Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the President of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, to organise for a meeting between Mr Saunders and the Pope.   
Abuse campaigner disputes removal from Vatican child protection commissionThe campaigner, who was the founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC), said that 15 members of the 17 commission voted in favour of a no-confidence motion in him (one abstained and another did not take part.)
He added that some commission members had expressed concerns around him speaking to the press. 
Mr Saunders has also spoken out against the Pope’s decision to appoint Bishop Juan Barros to the Diocese of Osorno in Chile as Bishop Barros has been accused of an abuse cover-up, even witnessing abuse.
The pontifical commission members include Baroness (Sheila) Hollins, Marie Collins, an Irish abuse survivor and Bill Kilgallon, former Chairman of the National Catholic Safeguarding Commission of England and Wales. Alongside Mr Saunders, Ms Collins is the only other abuse survivor on the commission.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Former pupils at St Bede's school to sue Salford Diocese over sexual abuse claims

Accused: Monsignor Thomas Duggan pictured at St Bede's

See:
 http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/st-bedes-abuse-victims-sue-10787276